Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Parkinson's disease trial illustrates the dangers of stopping early
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The trial of the Parkinson's Disease Research Group
reported by Ben-Shlomo et al in this issue (p 1191), which updates the results of a previously curtailed randomised controlled
trial,1 raises several methodological issues. The current
results relate to an initial three arm trial in which 782 patients with
early stage Parkinson's disease were randomised to treatment with
either levodopa alone (arm 1), levodopa and selegiline in combination (arm 2), or bromocriptine (arm 3). The first trial report, based on
follow up to December 1991, showed no significant differences at the
5% level between arms 1 and 2 in disability levels, but both arms
showed significant improvements over baseline.2 At this
stage there were too few deaths to assess differences in mortality. The
second report was based on follow up to December 1993, resulting in an
average 5.6 years follow up.3 As with the earlier report,
there continued to be no significant differences between arms 1 and 2 in terms