Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Freemantle et al's editorial on the use of statins started a
debate on treatment with cholesterol lowering drugs.
1 2
The subsequent editorial by Muldoon and Criqui,3 and many
of the letters on this issue,2 continued to focus on
identifying a level of absolute risk reduction at which treatment of
patients at risk of coronary heart disease would be advised and,
presumably, paid for by a healthcare service provider. In our opinion,
most of the discussion failed to separate the issue of rational policy setting by third party payers and that of individual decision making by
the doctor and patient.
Given the proved efficacy of some forms of lipid lowering drug
treatment, payment policies by healthcare service providers obviously
need to be drawn up with both costs and benefits in mind. This will
inevitably result in decisions being made about the subgroups of
patients or level of risk for which