Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Catherine A Hood a Ethox, Division of Public Health and Primary
Care, Institute of Health Care Sciences, Headington, Oxford
OX3 7LF, b Oxford Medical Illustration, John Radcliffe Hospital,
Oxford
Correspondence to: Dr Hood
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
A video showing real surgical operations was about to be sold through high street shops during the closing months of 1996. The BMA, GMC (General Medical Council), and the Institute of Medical Illustrators were quick to condemn this commercial exploitation of sensitive and confidential material. Media coverage was generally critical.1 A temporary injunction stopped any sales of the video, and a subsequent court order permanently prevented its distribution. Although the film's producer claimed that the surgeons concerned had given their permission for the video footage to be used, it emerged that many of the patients had not.
It is common practice to illustrate medical books with photographs of
patients. In how many such cases have the patients given valid consent
for publication? The advent of digital imaging has allowed photographs
and video recordings to be stored, accessed, and distributed around the
world with ease. Consequently, there is an increasing demand
Read all Rapid Responses