BMJ 1998;316:838-842 ( 14 March )

Clinical review

Fortnightly review

Secondary prevention in acute myocardial infarction

Rajendra H Mehta, cardiology fellowKim A Eagle, chief of clinical cardiology

University of Michigan Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Taubman Center 3910, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0366, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Eagle

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Acute myocardial infarction affects hundreds of thousands of people each year. Around a quarter die, half of them before reaching a hospital. Survivors are at increased risk of recurrent myocardial infarctions or cardiac death, with a 10% death rate in the first year after discharge and a subsequent annual death rate of 5%---six times that in people of the same age who do not have coronary artery disease. Whereas aggressive management of the acute infarction has been enthusiastically adopted, far less attention has been given to preventive strategies. Though most doctors agree with the importance of secondary prevention, the results of studies suggest that many patients are currently not being given optimal preventive care. Since most patients after acute myocardial infarction are routinely followed up in primary care, general practitioners must be fully informed and participate in treatment strategies designed for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.

    Methods

We . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Secondary prevention in acute myocardial infarction
Niall A Herity, Rajendra H Mehta, Kim A Eagle, Roger Harrison, Michael Burr, Angus Nightingale, Andrew Marshall, Jørgen Fischer Hansen, and R D Rice
BMJ 1998 317: 1152. [Extract] [Full Text]

Trial is needed of ACE inhibitors plus beta  blockers in survivors of myocardial infarction
Finlay A McAlister
BMJ 1998 317: 751. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Joshi, R., Chow, C. K., Raju, P. K., Raju, R., Reddy, K. S., MacMahon, S., Lopez, A. D., Neal, B. (2009). Fatal and Nonfatal Cardiovascular Disease and the Use of Therapies for Secondary Prevention in a Rural Region of India. Circulation 119: 1950-1955 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van der Elst, M. E, Bouvy, M. L, de Blaey, C. J, de Boer, A. (2007). Effect of drug combinations on admission for recurrent myocardial infarction. Heart 93: 1226-1230 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Nahra, T. A., Reiter, K. L., Hirth, R. A., Shermer, J. E., Wheeler, J. R. C. (2006). Cost-Effectiveness of Hospital Pay-for-Performance Incentives. Med Care Res Rev 63: 49S-72S [Abstract]  
  • van der Elst, M. E, Buurma, H., Bouvy, M. L, de Boer, A. (2003). Drug Therapy for Prevention of Recurrent Myocardial Infarction. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 37: 1465-1477 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van der Elst, M. E, Cisneros-Gonzalez, N., de Blaey, C. J, Buurma, H., de Boer, A. (2003). Oral Antithrombotic Use Among Myocardial Infarction Patients. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 37: 143-146 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Underwood, P, Beck, P (2002). Secondary prevention following myocardial infarction: evidence from an audit in South Wales that the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease does not address all the issues. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 230-232 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McManus, R J, Mant, J, Meulendijks, C F M, Salter, R A, Pattison, H M, Roalfe, A K, Hobbs, F D R (2002). Comparison of estimates and calculations of risk of coronary heart disease by doctors and nurses using different calculation tools in general practice: cross sectional study. BMJ 324: 459-464 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bolman, C., de Vries, H., van Breukelen, G. (2002). Evaluation of a nurse-managed minimal-contact smoking cessation intervention for cardiac inpatients. Health Educ Res 17: 99-116 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wright, J. M. (2000). Choosing a first-line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: What is the evidence? 3: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. CMAJ 163: 293-296 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • GEORGE, G. H. M., PATEL, S. (2000). Secondary prevention of hip fracture. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39: 346-349 [Full text]  
  • Wierzbicki, A. (2000). Lipids, cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 9: 194-201 [Abstract]  
  • Zijlstra, F., Hoorntje, J. C.A., de Boer, M.-J., Reiffers, S., Miedema, K., Ottervanger, J. P., van 't Hof, A. W.J., Suryapranata, H. (1999). Long-Term Benefit of Primary Angioplasty as Compared with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction. NEJM 341: 1413-1419 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Feder, G., Griffiths, C., Eldridge, S., Spence, M. (1999). Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 318: 1522-1526 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Herity, N. A, Mehta, R. H, Eagle, K. A, Harrison, R., Burr, M., Nightingale, A., Marshall, A., Hansen, J. F., Rice, R D (1998). Secondary prevention in acute myocardial infarction. BMJ 317: 1152a-1152 [Full text]  
  • McAlister, F. A (1998). Trial is needed of ACE inhibitors plus beta  blockers in survivors of myocardial infarction. BMJ 317: 751a-751 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

ACE inhibitors and beta blockers post MI: filling the evidence gap
Norman Sharpe
bmj.com, 16 Oct 1998 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ