BMJ 1998;316:794-795 ( 14 March )

Editorials

Electronic preprints: what should the BMJ do?

Clear labelling might be the answer 

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

What should journals do about the circulation of "preprints"---drafts of scientific papers that have not yet been formally published? Within the research community they serve several purposes. Some researchers routinely send such drafts to colleagues for their comments. Others use them as an early warning system, to keep colleagues abreast of research that may take months to get into print. Until recently distributing preprints entailed making multiple photocopies of a manuscript and posting them. The advent of faxes quickened the pace but did little to reduce the workload, which effectively limited their circulation. All this has changed with the internet. Draft manuscripts can now be posted on institutional or individual websites. Hundreds of colleagues, instead of a handful, may now see a preprint before its formal publication. Thousands more internet users may be led to a preprint by search engines, which scour the web's pages for key words.

Some . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Having electronic preprints is logical
John McConnell and Richard Horton
BMJ 1998 316: 1907. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Delamothe, T., Smith, R., Keller, M. A, Sack, J., Witscher, B. (1999). Netprints: the next phase in the evolution of biomedical publishing. BMJ 319: 1515-1516 [Full text]  
  • Smith, R. (1999). What is publication?. BMJ 318: 142-142 [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ