Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Electronic monitoring approaches should be more widely used
EditorGiuffrida and Torgerson’s paper focuses attention on a problem that is widely recognised but largely ignorednamely, compliance.1 Any measure that seeks to improve compliance with a prescribed regimen should be encouraged. As the authors concede in their introduction, however, the main challenge is identifying the patients whose compliance is considered to be inadequate.
Assessment of compliance should focus on the individual patient, and thus any approach that is targeted in a general manner at unselected populations is unlikely to be cost effective. The fundamental problem is that the prescribing clinician is unable to readily identify inadequate compliers and to distinguish them from poor responders or non-responders. This is not surprising as there is considerable evidence to indicate that compliance with a treatment regimen is not determined by age, sex, income, social status, level of educational achievement, or any other readily determinable factor.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?