Editorials

Effective screening in child health

In Britain today two neonatal screening programmes–for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism–are working well and preventing brain damage and severe intellectual impairment from these conditions. But for many of the other child health problems discussed last month at a meeting on systematic reviews of screening in child health organised by the National Screening Committee and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health there are doubts either about the value of early detection or about the most effective method for doing it.

Each year in the United Kingdom about 700 children are born with severely impaired hearing, and identifying them is important because early treatment improves their language development and emotional well being. The traditional distraction test of hearing at 8 months is failing them: the mean age for detecting severe deafness is 18 months. The evidence reviewed at the meeting shows clearly that universal (rather than targeted) electronic screening of . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Parents do not see GPs as source of help for emotionally disturbed schoolchildren

Stephen Turner
BMJ 1998 317: 212. [Extract] [Full Text]

Future of preschool vision screening

C Williams, R A Harrad, J M Sparrow, I Harvey, J Golding, John Lee, Gillian Adams, John Sloper, Ann McIntyre, Alistair R Fielder, G W Aylward, Jugnoo Rahi, and Carol Dezateux
BMJ 1998 316: 937. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Russ, S A, Rickards, F, Poulakis, Z, Barker, M, Saunders, K, Wake, M (2002). Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme. Arch. Dis. Child. 86: 245-250 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Scott, F. J., Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., Brayne, C. (2002). The CAST (Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test): Preliminary Development of a UK Screen for Mainstream Primary-School-Age Children. Autism 6: 9-31 [Abstract]  
• Baird, G, Charman, T, Cox, A, Baron-Cohen, S, Swettenham, J, Wheelwright, S, Drew, A (2001). Current topic: Screening and surveillance for autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Arch. Dis. Child. 84: 468-475 [Full text]  
• Kennedy, C. R, HALL, D., DAVIS, A. (2000). Current topic: Neonatal screening for hearing impairment. Arch. Dis. Child. 83: 377-383 [Full text]  
• Glazener, C. M A, Ramsay, C. R, Campbell, M. K, Booth, P., Duffty, P., Lloyd, D. J, McDonald, A., Reid, J A., Deeks, J. J (1999). Neonatal examination and screening trial (NEST): a randomised, controlled, switchback trial of alternative policies for low risk infants • Commentary: "Switchback" allocation---dangerous bends ahead!. BMJ 318: 627-632 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Voss, L. D (1999). Changing practice in growth monitoring. BMJ 318: 344-345 [Full text]  
• Rahi, J. S, Dezateux, C. (1999). National cross sectional study of detection of congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: role of childhood screening and surveillance. BMJ 318: 362-365 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Turner, S. (1998). Parents do not see GPs as source of help for emotionally disturbed schoolchildren. BMJ 317: 212-212 [Full text]  
• Williams, C, Harrad, R A, Sparrow, J M, Harvey, I, Golding, J, Lee, J., Adams, G., Sloper, J., McIntyre, A., Fielder, A. R, Aylward, G W, Rahi, J., Dezateux, C. (1998). Future of preschool vision screening. BMJ 316: 937a-937 [Full text]