Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Adequacy of SMAC's statement should be judged by clinicians, not health economists
See editorial by Muldoon
EditorFreemantle et al's editorial argues that the statement on the use of statins in coronary heart disease prepared by the Standing Medical Advisory Committee and issued recently by the NHS Executive is "simply inadequate."1 2 The adequacy or otherwise of advice depends on the context in which it was issued and whether it is appropriate for the purpose.
The context was the dramatic increase in the prescribing of statins since the publication
of
two landmark randomised controlled trials (the 4S (Scandinavian simvastatin survival
study)3 and WOSCOPS (the west of Scotland coronary
prevention study)4). Guidance issued by the European
Society
of Cardiology advised treating those of the population with a risk of coronary heart disease of
2% a year,5 and others have advocated treating
those with a risk of
1.5%. The annual cost to the
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?