Editorials

The future of preschool vision screening services in Britain

What should be done in Britain about existing and proposed programmes to screen preschool children for the related conditions of amblyopia, refractive error, and strabismus? Those who have visited this debate before may not be surprised that the recently published systematic review on preschool vision screening from the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination identified serious deficiencies in the research evidence which informs current policy.¹ However, the conclusions that "Providers currently offering screening programmes should consider discontinuing them" and, "From an ethical point of view, it is appropriate to continue to screen only in the context of a controlled trial of treatment" will undoubtedly prove more controversial.

The available research evidence has been interpreted differently in similar reviews from North America,^{2 3}where it has been concluded that preschool vision screening should continue. Why have reviewers reached different conclusions from essentially the same data? By integrating existing information in an unbiased . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Does amblyopia affect educational, health, and social outcomes? Findings from 1958 British birth cohort

J S Rahi, P M Cumberland, and C S Peckham
BMJ 2006 332: 820-825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Future of preschool vision screening

C Williams, R A Harrad, J M Sparrow, I Harvey, J Golding, John Lee, Gillian Adams, John Sloper, Ann McIntyre, Alistair R Fielder, G W Aylward, Jugnoo Rahi, and Carol Dezateux
BMJ 1998 316: 937. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Majeed, M, Williams, C, Northstone, K, Ben-Shlomo, Y (2008). Are there inequities in the utilisation of childhood eye-care services in relation to socio-economic status? Evidence from the ALSPAC cohort. Br J Ophthalmol 92: 965-969 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rahi, J S, Cumberland, P M, Peckham, C S (2006). Does amblyopia affect educational, health, and social outcomes? Findings from 1958 British birth cohort. BMJ 332: 820-825 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Williams, C, Northstone, K, Harrad, R A, Sparrow, J M, Harvey, I (2003). Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol 87: 988-993 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Williams, C, Northstone, K, Harrad, R A, Sparrow, J M, Harvey, I, ALSPAC Study Team, (2002). Amblyopia treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: follow up from randomised trial. BMJ 324: 1549-1549 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Juttmann, R. (2001). The Rotterdam AMblyopia Screening Effectiveness Study (RAMSES): compliance and predictive value in the first 2 years. Br J Ophthalmol 85: 1332-1335 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hartmann, E. E., Dobson, V., Hainline, L., Marsh-Tootle, W., Quinn, G. E., Ruttum, M. S., Schmidt, P. P., Simons, K., on Behalf of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, (2000). Preschool Vision Screening: Summary of a Task Force Report. Pediatrics 106: 1105-1116 [Full text]  
• Wedner, S. H, Ross, D. A, Balira, R., Kaji, L., Foster, A. (2000). Prevalence of eye diseases in primary school children in a rural area of Tanzania. Br J Ophthalmol 84: 1291-1297 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Newman, D. K, East, M. M (1999). Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 83: 676-679 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Simons, K., Preslan, M. (1999). Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance. Br J Ophthalmol 83: 582-587 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• MOSELEY, M. J (1998). Preschool vision screening: a recent report calls for a halt. Br J Ophthalmol 82: 722-723 [Full text]  
• Williams, C, Harrad, R A, Sparrow, J M, Harvey, I, Golding, J, Lee, J., Adams, G., Sloper, J., McIntyre, A., Fielder, A. R, Aylward, G W, Rahi, J., Dezateux, C. (1998). Future of preschool vision screening. BMJ 316: 937a-937 [Full text]