BMJ 1997;315:140 (19 July)

Editorials

London's healthcare services—again

Some good ideas, but implementation needs political skill and government commitment

Could there possibly be anything more to say about London's health services? First, we had the report of the first King's Fund Commission on London, London Health Care 2010,1 then the Tomlinson report,2 and then the government's white paper, Making London Better,3 which established the London Initiative Group and the London Initiative Zone for primary care development. All the reports stressed the need to improve primary care, especially the quality of general practice, the importance of rationalising and reconfiguring acute hospital services, and the need to reshape medical education and research to shift the focus of services towards community based rehabilitation and continuing care.

Huge efforts have been made in the past five years, but there is considerable scepticism that much has really changed. Plans to reconfigure acute hospital services have been stalled by local and political opposition and delays in agreeing funding through the private finance initiative. . . . [Full text of this article]

Not only what to do, but how
Financial incentives, legislation, and budgetary reform

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Health for London: showing England the way?
Ruth Thorlby, Jennifer Dixon, and Niall Dickson
BMJ 2007 335: 108-109. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Thorlby, R., Dixon, J., Dickson, N. (2007). Health for London: showing England the way?. BMJ 335: 108-109 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ