Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR,--The involvement of the BMA's ethics committee in the recent decision by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to refuse to allow Mrs Diane Blood to be inseminated with sperm obtained from her husband after his death was ill judged.1 In a letter to the authority Dr Stuart Horner, the chairman of the ethics committee, said, "ethically, whether the consent is in writing or given orally is irrelevant. The essential issue is the quality of that consent." No reasonable person would be likely to disagree with that sensible statement. However, he went on to say, "From the information portrayed in the media there is no evidence that Mr Blood had clearly thought through the issue."
Many people are extremely concerned that the ethics committee made representations to the authority on the basis of evidence purely derived from the media. As it happens,
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?