BMJ 1996;313:1328 (23 November)

Letters

Pulmonary artery catheters should be banned from intensive care units

EDITOR,--I congratulate Neil Soni on his controversial editorial questioning the value of pulmonary artery catheterisation.1 I have long been deeply cynical about the value of pulmonary artery catheters in critically ill patients. While they undoubtedly provide fascinating physiological data, there is no evidence that they play any part in reducing mortality.

In the intensive care unit at this hospital pulmonary artery catheters are associated with a 92% mortality. This does not mean that they actually cause death, since we reserve them for our illest patients, who have a high risk of death in any event, but it suggests that they are seldom of benefit to the patients.

It is hard to prove that pulmonary artery catheters have a negative impact on patients' survival despite the recent paper by Connors et al.2 It is easy, though, to postulate two mechanisms by which pulmonary artery catheters may tip the balance between life . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Swan song for the Swan-Ganz catheter?
Neil Soni
BMJ 1996 313: 763-764. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ