BMJ 1996;313:1149 (2 November)

Letters

An advisory committee on cancer registration has now been established

EDITOR,--I was surprised that N E Day and T W Davies cast doubt on whether the new purchasing arrangements would allow cancer registries to achieve the standards laid down in the core contract specification for cancer registries (sent to purchasers under cover of an executive letter ((96) 7) dated 9 February 1996) and by their call for a national body to oversee cancer registries.1

The executive letter acknowledged the crucial role of cancer registries in monitoring the implementation of national policies on preventing and treating cancer. It also emphasised their importance as a source of data for mapping geographical, social, and occupational trends in disease and mortality for regional, national, and international comparisons and the measurement of treatment outcomes, survival, and service effectiveness. The core contract proposed standards and targets for cancer registration, which aim to maintain and strengthen the cancer registration system, by raising those registries performing at the . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Cancer registration: integrate or disintegrate?
N E Day and T W Davies
BMJ 1996 313: 896. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dickinson, H O, Salotti, J A, Birch, P J, Reid, M M, Malcolm, A, Parker, L (2001). How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified by the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 55: 414-422 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ