BMJ 1996;313:1147 (2 November)

Letters

Giving vitamin K at birth

Approach to giving vitamin K should be reconsidered

EDITOR,--Alvin Zipursky concludes that intramuscular administration of vitamin K at birth is not associated with an increased risk of childhood cancer.1 The recommendation by the British Paediatric Association in 1992 that vitamin K should be given orally rather than intramuscularly was never successfully implemented,2 with the result that most maternity units continued to offer an intramuscular injection. The unease about the possible risk that this conferred was resolved by decisions to request informed parental consent. The way in which consent is requested, however, is often unsatisfactory. Parents have to make a difficult choice between two unlikely but disastrous outcomes, and if consent is requested in the labour ward (sometimes between delivery of the baby and the placenta) uptake is often poor.

Now that injections of vitamin K are believed to be safe it seems important to review this policy. Two courses of . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Vitamin K at birth
Alvin Zipursky
BMJ 1996 313: 179-180. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ