BMJ 1996;313:754 (21 September)

Letters

Women with urinary incontinence should be referred to a specialist

EDITOR,--Arnfinn Seim and colleagues give some useful reminders about improvements that can be achieved by treating urinary incontinence in women in general practice.1 At the end of their study, however, 80% of the women were still incontinent to some extent. It is interesting that only 16% of the patients were referred for specialist opinion. In the long term it may be better for patients to be referred for expert diagnosis and treatment, to avoid some of the long term financial and social burdens of prolonged incontinence.2 When the prospect is many years of incontinence (the youngest patient was only 20 years old) a referral to a specialist--who can perform urodynamic tests, make an accurate diagnosis, and devise a management plan--is preferable to making an unsupported diagnosis and providing treatment that may be inappropriate. Obtaining a good clinical history of bladder disorders is known to be difficult, so if treatment is . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Relevant Article

Treatment of urinary incontinence in women in general practice: observational study
Arnfinn Seim, Bjorg Sivertsen, Bjarne C Eriksen, and Steinar Hunskaar
BMJ 1996 312: 1459-1462. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ