BMJ 1996;313:227-228 (27 July)

Letters

Law has a protective function for both patients and doctors

EDITOR,--"Show me a hero and I will write you a tragedy"; so wrote F Scott Fitzgerald. Jack Kevorkian is a fanatic, not a hero.1

There are some practical reasons why the killing of a patient, even when problems seem insurmountable, must remain prohibited in law. The law has a protective function. It protects the vulnerable from misinformation due to mistakes by or the ignorance of the informer, from pressure by those with malintent, from economically driven judgments on their future, and from much more. It also protects us, as doctors, from ourselves: our ignorance or arrogance, any temptation to cover up medical mistakes, our difficulty in asking for help from a colleague, overinvolvement with a patient that colours our judgment, our fatigue, or personal prejudice or bias about clinical or social conditions. It protects us from undue pressure by relatives weary of caring or who stand to gain financially. Managers . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ