BMJ 1996;312:1672-1673 (29 June)

Letters

Gynaecological problems should continue to be treated in primary care initially

EDITOR,--S K Smith's provocative editorial argues that a more medical approach is needed in gynaecology.1 We are general practitioners in a busy group practice. One of us (DS) has a diploma from the Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; the other (CS) is a member of the same faculty, an instructing doctor in family planning, and a member of the British Menopause Society. We therefore have an interest in general practice gynaecology, which is a considerable part of our everyday work.

We think that Smith should elaborate on one of the sentences in the editorial: "The gynaecologists' bias against medical treatments is unlikely to be reduced while general practitioners, understandably less knowledgeable as they are, embark on ineffective medical treatments before referring patients to specialists." Is Smith suggesting that all patients with any sort of gynaecological problem should be referred . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Gynaecology--medical or surgical?
S K Smith
BMJ 1996 312: 592-593. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ