BMJ 1996;312:1421-1422 (1 June)

Letters

The nature of general practice

General practitioners are best placed to decide priorities

EDITOR,--It is hard to accept the arguments set out in Per Fugelli and Iona Heath's editorial on the nature of general practice.1 Comforting though it is to hang on to the accepted wisdoms of the past, nothing stands still. A general practitioner can no longer be seen as the lone friend and confidant of the patient, fighting his or her corner regardless of responsibilities to society. It is unreasonable to view the patient in isolation, with expense being regarded as of no importance and the needs of others irrelevant. We do not need to see ourselves in a mystical, priestly role, interceding on behalf of the patient from the surgery confessional. Rather, we should work with our primary health care teams, hospital colleagues, and health authorities. Together we can mould a service for patients that is both affordable and equitable.

There has . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The nature of general practice
Per Fugelli and Iona Heath
BMJ 1996 312: 456-457. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ