BMJ 1996;312:1157 (4 May)

Letters

Minimum standards should be set for near patient testing

EDITOR,--Richard Hobbs's editorial on near patient testing in primary care is welcome,1 as a large expansion in the use of such testing can be predicted. However, the importance of collaboration and discussion with hospital laboratories, and of adequate quality control, needs to be highlighted. The following recommendations should be useful.

Firstly, there should be a formal training programme for staff performing the tests. This could include training in the collection of specimens, the principles of the analysis, use of the machines, how to document results correctly, calibration and quality assessment, expected values of the analyte in health and disease, and the safe disposal of samples.

Secondly, the users of near patient testing apparatus should have to show their competence at regular intervals.

Thirdly, patients should be tested only by certified users.

Fourthly, a quality assurance programme, including both internal and external quality control, should be in operation and preferably should . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Near patient testing in primary care
Richard Hobbs
BMJ 1996 312: 263-264. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Crook, M A (2000). Near patient testing and pathology in the new millennium. J. Clin. Pathol. 53: 27-30 [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ