BMJ 1996;312:706 (16 March)
Letters
Clinical guidelines may obviate need for thought
EDITOR,--Having read Brian Hurwitz's editorial considering the fate of doctors who deviate from clinical guidelines and how they might fare in court,1 I thought that the everyday reality of clinical guidelines as seen from the perspective of a senior house officer might be of interest. Clinical guidelines are usually issued by specialist departments as an aid to staff. The number of guidelines gradually proliferates: most hospitals will have protocols for situations varying from the management of neutropenia induced by chemotherapy to the indications for which a full blood count may be requested by the casualty senior house officer. In almost all cases doctors have the greatest input into the formulation of these guidelines. So what is there to fear?
Unfortunately, in everyday practice it is not doctors but junior radiographers, biochemists who are medical laboratory scientific officers, or pharmacists who use the guidelines, absolutely confident in their knowledge of their . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Clinical guidelines and the law
- Brian Hurwitz
BMJ 1995 311: 1517-1518.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Armah, H. B., Narter-Olaga, E. G., Adjei, A. A., Asomaning, K., Gyasi, R. K., Tettey, Y.
(2006). Seroprevalence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I among pregnant women in Accra, Ghana. J Med Microbiol
55: 765-770
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Kurtz, J., Smith, N., Harbour, S.
(2000). HTLV-I is lower in blood donors in West Midlands than South Thames. BMJ
321: 380-380
[Full text]
-
Flanagan, P.
(1996). Making British blood supply safer. BMJ
312: 1674-1674
[Full text]