BMJ 1996;312:649-650 (16 March)

Editorials

Air pollution: time for more clean air legislation?

Ozone and fine exhaust particles make asthma worse

The industrial world has been so successful at dealing with smoke pollution that the avalanche of recent work showing that fine particles in the atmosphere are damaging health has come as an unwelcome surprise. Dockery and Pope published a summary of this evidence in 19941; since then more confirmatory evidence has appeared, and the conclusions have been independently validated.2 Further material appeared from Britain's Department of Health in a comprehensive review of non-biological particles and health,3 and the Department of the Environment has recommended a new standard of 50 µg/m3 for a 24 hour period for particles less than 10 microns in size (generally known as PM10).4 Achieving this new standard will set a considerable challenge for transport authorities in Europe and North America. The solutions may need radical new policies for urban transportation. Other regulatory and advisory agencies are engaged . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Air pollution related to transport
Robin Russell Jones
BMJ 1996 312: 1605-1606. [Extract] [Full Text]

Doctors should support parliamentary bill
Sarah Hill
BMJ 1996 312: 1606. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Jalaludin, B. B, Chey, T., O'Toole, B. I, Smith, W. T, Capon, A. G, Leeder, S. R (2000). Acute effects of low levels of ambient ozone on peak expiratory flow rate in a cohort of Australian children. Int J Epidemiol 29: 549-557 [Abstract] [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ