Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR,--Iolo Doull's recommendations about the role of steroids in the management of croup are controversial and deserve comment.1 An earlier publication that reviewed essentially the same reports was much more circumspect in its recommendations about nebulised steroids.2
There is now good evidence for a biological effect of oral, intravenous, and nebulised steroids in varying degrees of croup, but the evidence for a clinically important effect of nebulised steroids is less convincing. Studies relying on improvements in the croup score (which assigns numbers to clinical signs) as the main outcome measure3 4 can be criticised on the basis that the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the score (in all its various forms) have not been evaluated. Hence, while these studies have shown a significant difference between groups given nebulised steroids and those given placebo, the extent to which these changes in the score reflect
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?