BMJ 1996;312:309 (3 February)

Letters

Long term recurrence may be lower with laparoscopic repair

EDITOR,--In their study comparing laparoscopic with open repair of inguinal hernias Kate Lawrence and colleagues excluded 43% of patients considered for the trial.1 This is a high proportion: in our study five patients (3%) seen during the trial fulfilled our exclusion criteria.2

More complications occurred in the group that had laparoscopy in the authors' study. The surgical technique used probably accounts for three of the complications reported. The 12x8 cm mesh is too small and will result in recurrences; a 15x10 cm mesh is now widely accepted for unilateral repairs. In addition, the surgeons interposed mesh between the inferior epigastric vessels and the abdominal wall, which is unnecessary for fixation and presumably led to another complication--namely, vessel injury.

Cord seromas or haematomas occur quite often but have no sequelae and do not inhibit return to work. As the authors postulate, the problem may be prevented by transection of the sac . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results
Kate Lawrence, Douglas McWhinnie, Alex Goodwin, Helen Doll, Andrew Gordon, Alistair Gray, Julian Britton, and Jack Collin
BMJ 1995 311: 981-985. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ