BMJ 1996;312:52 (6 January)

Letters

Difficulties of routine treatment are exaggerated

EDITOR,--C M Sudlow and colleagues, and K G Sweeney and colleagues' commentary on their article, exaggerate the difficulties in acting on the research evidence on the use of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation.1 They point to the risk of bleeding, the need for data on prevalence, and patients' preferences as areas of uncertainty.

Much of the evidence on the incidence of bleeding as a side effect of anticoagulant treatment derives from data recorded in the 1980s and earlier, since when the technology of monitoring has improved. Nevertheless, bleeds are a reason to consider stopping treatment, on the grounds that patients' quality of life may be adversely affected by continued anticoagulation.2 Fortunately, results from controlled trials have been corroborated by experience of anticoagulant treatment in clinical practice from a large health maintenance organisation in Boston. Treatment of 65% of those with atrial fibrillation was achieved in a population with higher levels of . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

How To Do It: Service provision and use of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation
C M Sudlow, H Rodgers, R A Kenny, and R G Thomson
BMJ 1995 311: 558-560. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ