Letters
Proposals may damage one of finest examples of postgraduate medical education
EDITOR,--Registrars in general practice neither are ill informed about nor misunderstand the proposals for summative assessment, as is suggested by T Stuart Murray and Jacky Hayden respectively.1 2 It is precisely because they perceive both the dangers to training that the plans threaten and the precipitate and unprofessional manner in which they are being implemented that so many future general practitioners are expressing so much concern.
The two authors indicate the inconsistency and lack of rigour that are reflected in the assessment as proposed. One of the principal tenets of the package is that a national standard of competence should be applied. Hayden, however, indicates what many have found--that in some regions, as a result of funding difficulties and practical difficulties, the only component that will be used this year will be the structured trainers' report, which has not yet been fully tested, let alone validated. This makes it difficult to
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
StumbleUpon 
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
- Flexible partial shifts should be made to work
- Ed O'Neill
BMJ 1995 311: 1299.[Extract] [Full Text]
This Article
- Full text
- Respond to this article
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when responses are posted
- Alert me when a correction is posted
Services
- Email this article to a friend
- Find similar articles in BMJ
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Related Content
-
General practice / family medicine
- Relevant Article
- Find this article in its weekly table of contents
Bookmark with
What's new
Latest blogs
Find BMJ on:
Services
Tools
Online poll
Resources
Rapid responses for this article
There are no rapid responses for this article. Print issues
