Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR,--While we admire the way in which W Angus Wallace and T Wong dealt with a tension pneumothorax under the adverse circumstances of a long haul flight, some comments have left us confused and concerned.1
The inability of both clinicians to calculate the percentage of lignocaine provided (1%) serves to highlight the findings of S R
olfe andN J N Harper that many doctors are confused by the varying presentations of the drug content of an ampoule.2 Nevertheless, it seems that the lignocaine was used, as the chest drain was inserted "under local anaesthetic." In the discussion the authors comment that "a suitable local anaesthetic would, however, have been a helpful addition." This implies that the 1% lignocaine provided, and presumably used, was inadequate. Finally, the plan to include a 20 ml multidose phial of 2% lignocaine in the M5 medical
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?