BMJ 1995;311:1438 (25 November)

Letters

Primary care in accident and emergency departments

Outcomes of study cast doubt on sensitivity of triage decisions and triage criteria

EDITOR,--Jeremy Dale and colleagues highlight the difficult and unresolved problem of appropriate triage for patients attending accident and emergency departments with "primary care" type problems.1 We have had a primary care service in our accident and emergency department since February 1993, which we recently analysed.2

At St Mary's Hospital we developed a triage decision tree to help nurses differentiate between accident and emergncy and general practice patients. Those presenting with minor injuries considered to be unlikely to require radiography were channelled to see a general practitioner, while those likely to need a radiographic investigation were directed to an accident and emergency doctor. We think that it is appropriate to include this differentiation in the triage scheme because general practitioners are not specifically trained in interpreting x ray films. In the community general practitioners receive a radiologist's report . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary care in the accident and emergency department: I. Prospective identification of patients
Jeremy Dale, Judith Green, Fiona Reid, and Edward Glucksman
BMJ 1995 311: 423-426. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ