BMJ 1995;311:1304-1305 (11 November)

Letters

Volume and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting

EDITOR,--Amanda J Sowden and colleagues' meta-analysis of six studies of the relation between the volume of coronary bypass graft surgery performed and mortality concludes that the relation is less apparent with better adjustment for case mix and has becomne attenuated over time.1 Unfortunately, in the one study with clinical risk factors, which was also the most recent one and was carried out in New York, 96.7% of all patients were treated in the 26 (out of 30) hospitals with >200 cases. This makes it difficult to detect a volume effect in this study. Without additional studies with clinical risk factor models from other times and places it is impossible to test the authors' hypotheses.

We have addressed the question of a time trend, looking at Californian data for 1983-9. Adjusted death rates by volume of coronary artery bypass grafting were estimated with a risk model based on data from discharge . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact?
Amanda J Sowden, Jonathan J Deeks, and Trevor A Sheldon
BMJ 1995 311: 151-155. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ