BMJ 1995;311:1298 (11 November)

Letters

Survey illustrates misconception of the Calman proposals

EDITOR,--In their survey of consultant physicians' attitudes to the Calman proposals Hugh M Mather and Robert S Elkeles show an important misconception about the nature of those proposals and the manner of their implementation.1 Nevertheless, we shall do well to heed the responses they obtained.

In summarising the Calman proposals the authors assume that what was envisaged was a service essentially provided by consultants resident on call. Indeed, they repeatedly refer to a "consultant provided service." In fact, the Calman report referred only to a "consultant based service," and, while I accept that neither of the two terms has been defined, I know, having been a member of the original working party, that emergency services were never intended to be routinely provided by resident consultants. The report was published less than two years after the ministers had signed up to the principles of the new deal, which included the three . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Attitudes of consultant physicians to the Calman proposals: a questionnaire survey
Hugh M Mather and Robert S Elkeles
BMJ 1995 311: 1060-1062. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Paice, E., Aitken, M., Cowan, G., Heard, S. (2000). Trainee satisfaction before and after the Calman reforms of specialist training: questionnaire survey. BMJ 320: 832-836 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mather, H. M, Elkeles, R. S (1996). Attitude of consultant physicians to Calman proposals. BMJ 312: 443a-443 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ