BMJ 1995;311:811 (23 September)
Letters
Rationing: the case for "muddling through elegantly"
EDITOR,--Chris Ham's editorial on health care rationing1 misrepresents my position on the issue. He suggests that I subscribe to an approach to rationing by muddling through. My actual position is rather more subtle, hence the description "muddling through elegantly." I emphasise "elegantly" because I do not seek to defend the previous closed system, in which resource allocation decisions were often dressed up as clinical ones and hidden from public scrutiny.
I, too, support greater transparency in decision making, but I don't believe discussions about rationing can be tackled effectively or sensibly in a national debate. Muddling through elegantly starts from the premise that rationing will always be a messy affair. The choice confronting policy makers is as follows: does the inevitability of micro level rationing mean a continuation of the kind of diffuse, largely invisible, kind of rationing that has characterised the NHS, or is there a need to find . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Health care rationing
- Chris Ham
BMJ 1995 310: 1483-1484.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rao, J. N, Worth, C, Ellis, S. J, Heasell, S.
(1999). Rationing. BMJ
318: 940-940
[Full text]
-
Edwards, R. T.
(1999). Points for pain: waiting list priority scoring systems. BMJ
318: 412-414
[Full text]
-
Klein, R.
(1998). Puzzling out priorities. BMJ
317: 959-960
[Full text]
-
Holm, S., Sabin, J. E, Chinitz, D., Shalev, C., Galai, N., Israeli, A.
(1998). The second phase of priority setting • Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care • Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician's perspective on priority setting • Israel's basic basket of health services: the importance of being explicitly implicit. BMJ
317: 1000-1007
[Full text]