BMJ 1995;311:628 (2 September)

Letters

Identifying risks is futile without evaluations of risk reduction

EDITOR,--N Mamode and colleagues conclude that all surgeons should have a protocol for investigating patients who seem to be at risk of a myocardial infarction perioperatively.1 Even if it was possible to identify or quantify the risk accurately, however, there is little point in the exercise unless effective strategies exist for managing patients at risk. Many of the measures that can be undertaken to minimise risk--for example, control of hypertension and diabetes; weight loss; cessation of smoking; and, in particular, the avoidance of perioperative hypoxia and hypotension--should be routine in the management of all patients. Similarly, invasive monitoring of arterial and central venous pressure is routine in major operations, while insertion of pulmonary artery catheters has not been proved to have a beneficial effect on outcome.2 Intensive care should be provided for all patients undergoing repair of an aortic aneurysm or operation of similar magnitude but, given the excess of . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Infarcts after surgery
N Mamode, S Cobbe, and J G Pollock
BMJ 1995 310: 1215-1216. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ