BMJ 1995;311:571 (26 August)

Letters

Differences in mortality after fracture of hip

Doubt remains over anticoagulant prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis

EDITOR,--Anticoagulant prophylaxis may reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospital, but C J Todd and colleagues' study does not dispel doubts about its overall effect on mortality.1 There was no significant difference between the survival rate at 90 days (82.2% at the four hospitals that routinely gave such prophylaxis (to 79.5% of patients)) and 82.0% at the other four hospitals (prophylaxis given to only 16.1%) despite the fact that 62.3% of patients in the former hospitals had surgery within 24 hours (favourable to outcome) compared with only 50% in the latter (P<0.01, {chi}2 test). Hospital 4, which gave prophylaxis to the highest proportion of patients (91%), showed joint lowest 90 day survival (76%). In hospitals 5 and 8, in which only 10.5% of patients were given prophylaxis, 83% survived despite 4% dying of pulmonary embolism. None of the 13 patients diagnosed . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Differences in mortality after fracture of hip: the East Anglian audit
C J Todd, C J Freeman, C Camilleri-Ferrante, C R Palmer, A Hyder, C E Laxton, M J Parker, B V Payne, and N Rushton
BMJ 1995 310: 904-908. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ