BMJ 1995;311:327 (29 July)
Letters
Service should be reserved for equivocal cases
EDITOR,--C M Francis and colleagues claim that their open access echocardiography service was "well used" and led to advice being given to change management for nearly 70% of patients.1 I fear that they have been unsuccessful if they were trying to increase the currently low rates of prescription of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: the number of patients referred for echocardiography was small compared with the numbers of patients with known and unknown left ventricular dysfunction in the study population. The study population can be assumed to be roughly 1.1 million (assuming average practice lists for the 550 general practitioners canvassed). Among these patients up to 2% may already have left ventricular dysfunction2 (that is, over 22000) and an annual incidence of left ventricular dysfunction of 0.1 to -0.2% (that is, 1100-2200 patients) coud be expected. So the referral of 259 patients for echocardiography over five months is . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Open access echocardiography in management of heart failure in the community
- C M Francis, L Caruana, P Kearney, M Love, G R Sutherland, I R Starkey, T R D Shaw, and J J V McMurray
BMJ 1995 310: 634-636.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Khunti, K.
(2004). Systematic review of open access echocardiography for primary care. Eur J Heart Fail
6: 79-83
[Abstract]
[Full text]