BMJ 1995;311:263 (22 July)

Letters

Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care

EDITOR,--K Field and colleagues claim to have evaluated the cost effectiveness of intervention protocols in primary care to reduce cardiovascular disease.1 They examined the costs of treatment with cholesterol lowering drugs (pounds sterling235/year) and ignored the cost of antihypertensive treatment (pounds sterling180-260/year). The costs of medical treatment for both conditions, including dietary modification of obesity and salt intake in hypertension, were roughly equivalent. Rates of therapeutically important severe hypertension (4.4%; 115/2607) and hyperlipidaemia (4.1%; 107/2607) are similar,2 and some patients need treatment for both conditions. Calculations of the cost of cardiovascular screening should be based on the costs of treating both conditions with advice about lifestyle, diet, and drugs.

The authors' clinical approach used 100 minutes of nursing time and 10 minutes of the general practitioner's time per patient. It is odd that dietary information was gathered in preference to a family history of cardiovascular disease, which is more relevant . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective?
K Field, M Thorogood, C Silagy, C Normand, C O'Neill, and J Muir
BMJ 1995 310: 1109-1112. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ