BMJ 1995;311:209-210 (22 July)

Editorials

Performance indicators for general practice

Will lead to league tables of performance

Some family health services authorities are now producing performance indicators for the general practices they administer.1 2 3 With the move towards a primary care led NHS,4 5 these indicators will become an important management tool. League tables of practice performance are a possibility: for example, practices could be ranked by rates of uptake of cervical smear tests and the proportion of drugs prescribed generically. Many general practitioners, particularly those who work in deprived communities, will find this development threatening and may think that league tables will unfairly label their practice as performing poorly. Family health services authorities must therefore ensure that performance indicators are interpreted appropriately.6

Performance indicators may be used to identify and reward high performing practices with increased allocations for staff and premises. Conversely, if resources are allocated according to health need rather than performance, then less well developed practices (which are often . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Improving the quality of care with performance indicators
Azeem Majeed, Helen Lester, and Andrew B Bindman
BMJ 2007 335: 916-918. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Use of performance indicators for general practice
Sarah J Baker
BMJ 1996 312: 58. [Extract] [Full Text]

Performance indicators for general practice
Frances Mair
BMJ 1995 311: 1167-1168. [Extract] [Full Text]

Inadequate smears are not always due to poor technique
Andrea Tree and Paul Mansour
BMJ 1995 311: 1168. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Majeed, A., Lester, H., Bindman, A. B (2007). Improving the quality of care with performance indicators. BMJ 335: 916-918 [Full text]  
  • Love, T., Dowell, A. C, Salmond, C., Crampton, P. (2004). Quality indicators and variation in primary care: modelling GP referral patterns. Fam Pract 21: 160-165 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • HOWLEY, P. P., GIBBERD, R. (2003). Using hierarchical models to analyse clinical indicators: a comparison of the gamma-Poisson and beta-binomial models. Int J Qual Health Care 15: 319-329 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Unal, B, Critchley, J A, Capewell, S (2003). Missing, mediocre, or merely obsolete? An evaluation of UK data sources for coronary heart disease. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 530-535 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Goldfield, N., Gnani, S., Majeed, A. (2003). Primary care in the United States: Profiling performance in primary care in the United States. BMJ 326: 744-747 [Full text]  
  • Riad, S F, Dart, J K G, Cooling, R J (2003). Primary care and ophthalmology in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol 87: 493-499 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Marshall, M. N, Hiscock, J., Sibbald, B. (2002). Attitudes to the public release of comparative information on the quality of general practice care: qualitative study. BMJ 325: 1278-1278 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Heaney, D. J, Walker, J. J, Howie, J. G., Maxwell, M., Freeman, G. K, Berrey, P. N., Jones, T. G, Stern, M. C, Campbell, S. M (2002). The development of a routine NHS data-based index of performance in general practice (NHSPPI). Fam Pract 19: 77-84 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Joesbury, H, Mathers, N, Lane, P (2001). Supporting GPs whose performance gives cause for concern: the North Trent experience. Fam Pract 18: 123-130 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Howie, J. G R, Heaney, D. J, Maxwell, M., Walker, J. J, Freeman, G. K, Rai, H. (1999). Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. BMJ 319: 738-743 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Myers, P., Shah, S., Cook, A., Scanlon, T., Tarrant, P., Cranney, M., Barton, S., McColl, A., Roderick, P., Gabbay, J., Smith, H., Moore, M. (1999). Performance indicators for primary care groups. BMJ 318: 803-803 [Full text]  
  • Naish, J., Moser, K., Sturdy, P., Carter, Y. H. (1999). Using administrative data for primary care research: the City and East London General Practice Database Project. Health Informatics Journal 5: 30-34 [Abstract]  
  • McColl, A., Roderick, P., Gabbay, J., Smith, H., Moore, M. (1998). Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach. BMJ 317: 1354-1360 [Full text]  
  • Pollock, A. M, Vickers, N. (1998). Deprivation and emergency admissions for cancers of colorectum, lung, and breast in south east England: ecological study. BMJ 317: 245-252 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Majeed, A., Head, S. (1998). Controversies in primary care Setting prescribing budgets in general practice • Capitation based prescribing budgets will not work. BMJ 316: 748-753 [Full text]  
  • Greenhalgh, T. (1998). Effective prescribing at practice level should be identified and rewarded. BMJ 316: 750-750 [Full text]  
  • Majeed, A., Evans, N., Head, P. (1997). What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice?. BMJ 315: 1515-1519 [Full text]  
  • Majeed, A. (1996). Allocating budgets for fundholding and prescribing. BMJ 313: 1274-1275 [Full text]  
  • Jenkins, C., Campbell, J. (1996). Catchment areas in general practice and their relation to size and quality of practice and deprivation: a descriptive study in one London borough. BMJ 313: 1189-1192 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Baker, S. J (1996). Use of performance indicators for general practice. BMJ 312: 58b-58 [Full text]  
  • Tree, A., Mansour, P. (1995). Inadequate smears are not always due to poor technique. BMJ 311: 1168-1168 [Full text]  
  • Mair, F. (1995). Performance indicators for general practice. BMJ 311: 1167c-1168 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ