BMJ 1995;311:122 (8 July)
Letters
Written protocols do not solve difficulties
EDITOR,--Much is made by the protagonists of interventional ventilation1 of its approval by, among others, the BMA. The association's guidance included the recommendation that, in each unit, a comprehensive protocol should exist from which no deviation should be permitted.2 It is therefore worrying that, in the study in Exeter on which the strategy is based, circumstances "made some deviation from the protocol necessary" in four of the nine patients admitted to intensive care.3 If this was the case in the ideal circumstances of the centre that pioneered the approach, considerable "bending of the rules" might well occur in less well organised hospitals.
Robert Francis proposes incorporating appropriately worded consent to interventional ventilation in the wording of the organ donor card as a means of overcoming existing legal barriers.1 He argues that, if competent patients can decline lifesaving treatment, why should they not be able to consent to such a non-therapeutic . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
An Ethical Debate: Elective ventilation of potential organ donors
- Hany Riad and Anthony Nicholls
BMJ 1995 310: 714-715.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
l'Hoir, M P, Engelberts, A C, van Well, G T. J, Westers, P, Mellenbergh, G J, Wolters, W H G, Huber, J
(1998). Case-control study of current validity of previously described risk factors for SIDS in the Netherlands. Arch. Dis. Child.
79: 386-393
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Morse, D. I
(1996). Directly observed therapy for tuberculosis. BMJ
312: 719-720
[Full text]
-
Fabre, J
(1995). Elective ventilation of potential organ donors. BMJ
311: 950-950
[Full text]