BMJ 1995;310:1195 (6 May)
Letters
Patients prefer clinics to have non-descriptive titles
EDITOR,--Yvonne Stedman and Max Elstein suggest that genitourinary medicine and family planning services should work closely together in an attempt to provide a comprehensive sexual health service for patients.1 Many genitourinary medicine clinics have for some time appreciated the need for sexual health care and provide skill in colposcopy, psychosexual medicine, and genital dermatology in addition to prescribing or offering advice on contraception. Although the days of the old style "venereal disease clinic" are gone, the associated stigma remains. The change of name from venereology to genitourinary medicine has helped to emphasise the wider remit of the specialty, which in turn will aid the process of reducing the stigmatisation. The use of the term sexual health clinic might, however, reverse this trend.
To establish which title is preferred by people attending clinics, 150 patients were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire asking what name they would like to see on . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Rethinking sexual health clinics
- Yvonne Stedman and Max Elstein
BMJ 1995 310: 342-343.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bolsin, S., Gibbs, J. L, Cunningham, D.
(2002). Mortality and volume of cases in paediatric cardiac surgery. BMJ
324: 1095-1095
[Full text]
-
Bolsin, S. N, Stewart, J.
(1998). The Wisheart affair: responses to Dunn • The Bristol cardiac disaster • Editor's response to Stephen Bolsin • A patient's perspective. BMJ
317: 1579-1582
[Full text]