Editorials

Unified training grade

The report of the working party on the unified training grade¹ is the first piece of a jigsaw that will provide the picture for higher specialist training recommended in the Calman report.² But even after elision of the registrar and senior registrar grades, in Britain, unlike in other members of the European Union, specialist training will comprise two grades: senior house officer and specialist registrar.

Entry to, assessment of progress through, and exit from the new specialist registrar grade will be managed by postgraduate deans in close collaboration with the medical royal colleges. Before the new grade is implemented satisfactory appointment systems and instruments for assessment will have to be developed and the curriculums for all specialties and other guidance will need to be published. All specialties are expected to begin transitional arrangements within one year of the commissioning date, but much more information, particularly . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Unified training grade

Jeremy Wight and Nick Payne
BMJ 1995 310: 1673. [Extract] [Full Text]

Expanding consultant numbers is not enough

David Flook
BMJ 1995 310: 1673-1674. [Extract] [Full Text]

Vocational training for GPs should be community based

Jamie Bahrami
BMJ 1995 310: 1674. [Extract] [Full Text]

Unified training grade

C R Jennings
BMJ 1995 310: 1538. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bahrami, J. (1995). Vocational training for GPs should be community based. BMJ 310: 1674-1674 [Full text]  
• Wight, J., Payne, N. (1995). Unified training grade. BMJ 310: 1673c-1673 [Full text]  
• Flook, D. (1995). Expanding consultant numbers is not enough. BMJ 310: 1673d-1674 [Full text]  
• Jennings, C R (1995). Unified training grade. BMJ 310: 1538a-1538 [Full text]