BMJ 1995;310:685-686 (18 March)

Editorials

Follow up in breast cancer

A suitable case for reappraisal

As the morning progresses the hospital waiting area fills up with anxious, mostly grey haired women. They have been treated for breast cancer in the past and are attending for "routine" follow up. For those who are apparently free of disease, what is the purpose of follow up, how often should it be done, and by whom, and what investigations, if any, should be performed routinely?

A recent consensus statement focuses on these issues1 and is particularly valuable in highlighting interventions of no value and areas of continued uncertainty. The main purpose of follow up is summarised as "the earliest possible diagnosis of a relapse with a view to applying a curative second line treatment." How often do we achieve this?

Distant metastatic disease is currently incurable, so its detection is not part of the main purpose of follow up. In any case, routine follow . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Patients prefer hospital follow up for cancer
Rob Glynne-Jones, Ian Chait, Sally Thomas, and Ivan Trotman
BMJ 1995 311: 1574-1575. [Extract] [Full Text]

Follow up in breast cancer
Eva Grunfeld, Pat Yudkin, Ruth Adewuyl-Dalton, Martin P Vessey, and David Mant
BMJ 1995 311: 54. [Extract] [Full Text]

Patients prefer specialist follow up
Jane Maher, Jane Bradburn, and Ruth Adewuyi-Dalton
BMJ 1995 311: 54. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Grunfeld, E., Levine, M. N., Julian, J. A., Coyle, D., Szechtman, B., Mirsky, D., Verma, S., Dent, S., Sawka, C., Pritchard, K. I., Ginsburg, D., Wood, M., Whelan, T. (2006). Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist Care. JCO 24: 848-855 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Loprinzi, C. L., Hayes, D., Smith, T. (2003). Doc, Shouldn't We Be Getting Some Tests?. JCO 21: 108s-111 [Full text]  
  • Allum, W H, Griffin, S M, Watson, A, Colin-Jones, D (2002). Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 50 : v1-v23 [Full text]  
  • Loprinzi, C. L., Hayes, D., Smith, T. (2000). Doc, Shouldn't We Be Getting Some Tests?. JCO 18: 2345-2348 [Full text]  
  • Gulliford, T., Opomu, M., Wilson, E., Hanham, I., Epstein, R. (1997). Popularity of less frequent follow up for breast cancer in randomised study: initial findings from the hotline study. BMJ 314: 174-174 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Grunfeld, E., Mant, D., Yudkin, P., Adewuyi-Dalton, R., Cole, D., Stewart, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Vessey, M. (1996). Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ 313: 665-669 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Glynne-Jones, R., Chait, I., Thomas, S., Trotman, I. (1995). Patients prefer hospital follow up for cancer. BMJ 311: 1574c-1575 [Full text]  
  • Grunfeld, E., Yudkin, P., Adewuyl-Dalton, R., Vessey, M. P, Mant, D. (1995). Follow up in breast cancer. BMJ 311: 54-54 [Full text]  
  • Maher, J., Bradburn, J., Adewuyi-Dalton, R. (1995). Patients prefer specialist follow up. BMJ 311: 54a-54 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ