Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR, - D A H Laidlaw and colleagues' paper linking a reduction in referrals for glaucoma to a reduction in the number of eye examinations since the termination of universally free examinations omits some important factors.1 The article refers to the predicted number of referrals for glaucoma, although the actual number was on a par with the years just before the termination of the universally free examination.
Many optometry practices have stepped up pathology screening programmes in recent years. This reflects both the increased number of optometrists who have had training that places a greater emphasis on this aspect of the work and an increased awareness on the part of optometrists in general. Ever since the introduction of non-contact tonometry ophthalmologists have pointed out the shortcomings of a single and questionable reading on which to base referrals because it generates too many false positive
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?