BMJ 1994;309:1304-1305 (12 November)

Letters

Obtaining useful data from primary care

EDITOR, - F M Haste points out the need for good quality data on preventive issues in primary care and the shortcomings of the current banding system for health promotion.1 M C Record and colleagues found that general practitioners had similar concerns and would prefer more relevant standardised data.2

We have adopted a standard procedure for documenting preventive activities recorded by general practitioners in inner London to provide comparable data among practices and over time. Sixty general practitioners participated in a study. We found that only half of preventive activities recorded by general practitioners were recorded on the practice computer and that a system that relied entirely on this source would not necessarily reflect what was being done. Secondly, there were major differences in the denominator: when a simple procedure was used between 15% and 37% of the registered population aged 30-64 were excluded from the final denominator because they . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

No secular decline in fecundity has occurred in Sweden
U Hogberg and M Wulff
BMJ 1994 309: 959. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ