BMJ 1994;309:1177-1178 (5 November)

Editorials

Health costs of social injustice

The benefits of increasing technological power for the mass of the population, in terms of higher living standards, greater freedom, and better health, have never been automatic. Reforming energy and social innovation have always been necessary for people to reap the full benefit of economic and scientific advances. The significance of last month's report by the Commission on Social Justice needs to be understood within this history of reform.1,2

One hundred and sixty years ago the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 established the "workhouse rule," according to which unemployed people were obliged to enter prison-like workhouses to become eligible for "relief." The act was intended to cut the cost of "poor relief" and to create what we would now call a labour market. In this market people (or at least their ability to work) would be treated as commodities to be bought and sold by the owners of the . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Heath, I. (1994). The poor man at his gate. BMJ 309: 1675-1676 [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ