BMJ 1994;309:789-792 (24 September)

Education and debate

Systematic Reviews: Meta-analysis and its problems

H J Eysenck 

Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF.

Including all relevant material - good, bad, and indifferent - in meta -analysis admits the subjective judgments that meta-analysis was designed to avoid. Several problems arise in meta-analysis: regressions are often non -linear; effects are often multivariate rather than univariate; coverage can be restricted; bad studies may be included; the data summarised may not be homogeneous; grouping different causal factors may lead to meaningless estimates of effects; and the theory-directed approach may obscure discrepancies. Meta-analysis may not be the one best method for studying the diversity of fields for which it has been used.

Why do we undertake systematic reviews of a given field? The most important reason is perhaps that we are concerned about a particular theory and wish to know how the evidence for and against stacks up. There are also practical reasons; single studies often use small numbers of subjects, and basing our estimates of effect . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Rosiglitazone and implications for pharmacovigilance
Dhruv Kazi
BMJ 2007 334: 1233-1234. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Adams, C. E., Coutinho, E. S. F., Davis, J., Duggan, L., Leucht, S., Li, C., Tharyan, P. (2008). Cochrane Schizophrenia Group. Schizophr Bull 34: 259-265 [Full text]  
  • Kazi, D. (2007). Rosiglitazone and implications for pharmacovigilance. BMJ 334: 1233-1234 [Full text]  
  • Geddes, J. (2006). Meta-analysis in the assessment of treatment outcome. J Psychopharmacol 20: 67-71 [Abstract]  
  • Noble, D. W. (2004). Dose Effects of Steroids on Survival in Sepsis. ANN INTERN MED 141: 891-891 [Full text]  
  • Lorant, V., Deliege, D., Eaton, W., Robert, A., Philippot, P., Ansseau, M. (2003). Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Epidemiol 157: 98-112 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hoffmann, K., Kroke, A., Klipstein-Grobusch, K., Boeing, H. (2002). Standardization of Dietary Intake Measurements by Nonlinear Calibration Using Short-term Reference Data. Am J Epidemiol 156: 862-870 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Griffin, S., Greenhalgh, T. (1998). Diabetes care in general practice: meta-analysis of randomised control trials • Commentary: Meta-analysis is a blunt and potentially misleading instrument for analysing models of service delivery. BMJ 317: 390-396 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van der Heijden, G. J M G, van der Windt, D. A W M, de Winter, A. F (1997). Physiotherapy for patients with soft tissue shoulder disorders: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 315: 25-30 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fabbri, A., Magrini, N., Bianchi, G., Zoli, M., Marchesini, G. (1996). Overview of Randomized Clinical Trials of Oral Branched-Chain Amino Acid Treatment in Chronic Hepatic Encephalopathy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 20: 159-164 [Abstract]  
  • Gilkey, E. A. (1995). Antibiotic Treatment for Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. JAMA 274: 1131-1131 [Abstract]  



Doc2Doc Vacancy
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ