BMJ 1994;309:755-756 (24 September)

Editorials

Understanding clinical trials

What measures of efficacy should journal articles provide busy clinicians?

The randomised clinical trial has revolutionised the way that we decide whether a treatment or intervention does more good than harm. In its breadth and explanatory power it provides a cornerstone not only for evidence based medicine1 but for evidence based public health, evidence based hospital administration, evidence based purchasing, and evidence based consumerism.

Randomised trials provide not only qualitative conclusions about whether a treatment is better but also quantitative estimates of the extent to which it is better. Take as an example (with rounded numbers) an overview of the effects of treatment with antihypertensive drugs on patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Trials have shown that about 1800 strokes occur among 15 000 patients randomised to active drugs for an average of five years, while about 3000 such events occur in 15 000 randomised to placebo or no active . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cuite, C. L., Weinstein, N. D., Emmons, K., Colditz, G. (2008). A Test of Numeric Formats for Communicating Risk Probabilities. Med Decis Making 28: 377-384 [Abstract]  
  • Collins, J. A., Fauser, B. C.J.M. (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Hum Reprod Update 11: 103-104 [Full text]  
  • Piazza, M., Sagliocca, L., Tosone, G., Guadagnino, V., Stazi, M. A., Orlando, R., Borgia, G., Rosa, D., Abrignani, S., Palumbo, F., Manzin, A., Clementi, M. (1997). Sexual Transmission of the Hepatitis C Virus and Efficacy of Prophylaxis With Intramuscular Immune Serum Globulin: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Intern Med 157: 1537-1544 [Abstract]  
  • Fahey, T P, Peters, T J (1996). What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient based comparison of hypertension guidelines. BMJ 313: 93-96 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hux, J. E., Naylor, C. D. (1995). In the Eye of the Beholder. Arch Intern Med 155: 2277-2280 [Abstract]  
  • Fahey, T, Griffiths, S, Peters, T J (1995). Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews. BMJ 311: 1056-1059 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wieland, D., Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., adams, J., Rubenstein, L. Z. (1995). Meta-Analytic Methods for Health Services Research: An Example from Geriatrics. Eval Health Prof 18: 252-282 [Abstract]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ