BMJ 1994;309:142-143 (16 July)

Editorials

Please bypass the PORT

Struggling to contain health care costs, the United States has devoted considerable attention to health technology assessment, producing clinical guidelines and measures of appropriateness, organising consensus conferences, and carrying out studies of practice variation and "outcomes research." Serious reservations have been expressed about the scientific validity of some of these approaches. Controversy focuses particularly on the use of routine health records to assess the effectiveness of treatments. Such studies conflict with the British tradition of using randomised controlled trials. Last year the New York Academy of Sciences brought together the exponents of different approaches to evaluating health care. The results have now been published in a book, which also provides edited accounts of the often heated discussion.1

When Congress created the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research in 1989 it was anxious for quick results, assuming that analysis of databases would provide technical solutions to the United States' health . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Research into outcomes and effectiveness
R J Greene and C W Maklan
BMJ 1994 309: 879-880. [Extract] [Full Text]

Methods of assessing medical treatments
A Fontaine and P Durieux
BMJ 1994 309: 741. [Extract] [Full Text]

Experimental and observational methods of evaluation
N Black
BMJ 1994 309: 540. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Clancy, M J (2002). Overview of research designs. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 546-549 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • GILBODY, S. M., HOUSE, A. O., SHELDON, T. A. (2002). Outcomes research in mental health: Systematic review. Br. J. Psychiatry 181: 8-16 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Murray, S. A (1999). Experiences with "rapid appraisal" in primary care: involving the public in assessing health needs, orientating staff, and educating medical students. BMJ 318: 440-444 [Full text]  
  • Smith, I. (1995). Commissioning complementary medicine. BMJ 310: 1151-1152 [Full text]  
  • Mullee, M. A, Julious, S. A (1995). Authors' reply. BMJ 310: 329c-329 [Full text]  
  • Oakley, A., Fullerton, D., Holland, J., Arnold, S., France-Dawson, M., Kelley, P., McGrellis, S. (1995). Sexual health education interventions for young people: a methodological review. BMJ 310: 158-162 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Shepperd, S., Jenkinson, C., Morgan, P. (1995). Randomised controlled trials and health services research. BMJ 310: 125d-126 [Full text]  
  • Greene, R J, Maklan, C W (1994). Research into outcomes and effectiveness. BMJ 309: 879a-880 [Full text]  
  • Fontaine, A, Durieux, P (1994). Methods of assessing medical treatments. BMJ 309: 741-741 [Full text]  
  • Black, N (1994). Experimental and observational methods of evaluation. BMJ 309: 540a-540 [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ