BMJ 1994;308:1583-1584 (18 June)

Editorials

Using outcomes research in clinical practice

Until recently the usual surgical response to urinary symptoms and an enlarged prostate has been to recommend prostatectomy. What are the risks of adopting instead a policy of watchful waiting? We did not know. Which operation has the lower long term mortality: transurethral resection or open surgery? Once again we do not know with certainty. What of the other adverse outcomes of prostatic surgery, such as permanent sexual or urinary dysfunction: how much do these matter to patients? More fundamentally, what criteria do we use to judge the success of a surgical or medical intervention for "prostatic" symptoms - urinary flow rates (objective) or patients' symptoms (subjective)?

Benign prostatic hyperplasia caught the attention of health services researchers because of its strikingly different treatment rates both between and within countries1,2; they then uncovered just how much was unknown about the condition and its treatments. Now through outcomes research, they are . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Outcomes research in clinical practice Descriptive studies are unhelpful
M Gregory, F Ledwith, and D Lyon
BMJ 1994 309: 412. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gregory, M, Ledwith, F, Lyon, D (1994). Outcomes research in clinical practice Descriptive studies are unhelpful. BMJ 309: 412-412 [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ