BMJ 1994;308:1099-1100 (23 April)

Letters

Caring for patients with asthma Guidance on routine self monitoring is not satisfactory

EDITOR, - The authors of the Grampian asthma study of integrated care failed to provide convincing evidence that routine self monitoring of peak expiratory flow does not improve asthma morbidity.1 Several design flaws in the study related to power, patient selection, the intervention delivered, and outcome measures need discussing.

The power calculation is based on 569 subjects, but data is provided for only 485 (239 monitoring peak expiratory flow, 246 controls); what about the other 84 patients? The physicians' guidelines included two action levels depending on peak expiratory flow: when to start oral steroids (for severe episodes of asthma) and when to seek medical assistance. Given that patients with mild asthma were selected (those possessing peak flow meters were excluded from randomisation) and the weak power, the study design biased evaluation against effective routine self monitoring of peak expiratory flow.

At least four hospital centres (and an unstated number of . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Effectiveness of routine self monitoring of peak flow in patients with asthma
N Drummond, M Abdalla, J A G Beattie, J K Buckingham, T Lindsay, L M Osman, S J Ross, A Roy-Chaudhury, I Russell, M Turner, J A R Friend, J S Legge, and J G Douglas
BMJ 1994 308: 564-567. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Charlton, I, Charlton, G A, Jones, A, Drummond, N, Abdalla, M, Beattie, J, Russell, I, Friend, J, Legge, J, Douglas, G (1994). Caring for patients with asthma Teaching self management takes time. BMJ 308: 1370-1 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ