Education and debate

In defence of merit awards

Meyerstein Institute of Oncology, Middlesex Hospital, University College London Hospital Trust, London W1M 8AA.

Never one to avoid controversy, Aneurin Bevan knew from the start that his newly nationalised health service could work only with the full cooperation of the profession. Although a Gallup poll taken early in 1948 confirmed that the overwhelming majority of the public supported it, Bevan was enough of a pragmatist to realise that the doctors were another matter altogether - read Michael Foot's wonderful biography for a thrilling account.¹

The merit award system was born of Bevan's recognition that to retain the services of the best, you must expect to pay. "Stuff their mouths with gold" was his simple yet effective prescription, a staggering volte face for an unflinchingly egalitarian Welshman. Effective? Highly, since most would agree that during the NHS's first half century one of its more remarkable features has been that the most outstanding individuals have indeed been attracted to staying within the service, usually working . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Merit awards

G D P Wallen
BMJ 1994 308: 1712-1713. [Extract] [Full Text]

Doomed by subjective assessment

B A Evans
BMJ 1994 308: 1165. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Smith, J, Simpson, J (1994). Locally determined performance related pay. BMJ 309: 495-496 [Full text]  
• Wallen, G D P (1994). Merit awards. BMJ 308: 1712-1713 [Full text]  
• Bulstrode, C., Maynard, A. (1994). Merit awards. BMJ 308: 1165b-1165 [Full text]  
• Boon, A. (1994). Paging Dr Pangloss. BMJ 308: 1165c-1165 [Full text]  
• Evans, B A (1994). Doomed by subjective assessment. BMJ 308: 1165d-1165 [Full text]