BMJ 1994;308:285-286 (29 January)

Editorials

Screening for cardiovascular risk in general practice

One of the most controversial components of the new contract imposed on British general practitioners in 1990 was the requirement to offer regular health checks to the public. This requirement came even though multiphasic health checks had been shown to be ineffective in terms of their impact on morbidity and mortality.1,2

During the 1970s case finding and health promotion had become to be regarded as options available to general practitioners during consultations,3 but during the 1980s the value of blanket (population) screening of all adults was disputed.4,5 The professional and scientific concerns were, nevertheless, ignored when the government required general practitioners (or their staff) to perform health checks of the population and also to identify cardiovascular risk factors for all adults and intervene appropriately.6

This week's BMJ publishes the early results of two large scale evaluations of health checks and interventions for cardiovascular risk factors from general practice (p 308, . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lauritzen, T., Ager Jensen, M. S., Thomsen, J. L., Christensen, B., Engberg, M. (2008). Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs: An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP). Scand J Public Health 36: 650-661 [Abstract]  
  • van den Berg, P. J, van Dalsen, C. L, de Rooij, R. A., Prins, A., Hoes, A. W (1999). Cardiovascular health check in the elderly in one general practice: does it offer new information and lead to interventions?. Fam Pract 16: 389-394 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hilton, S., Doherty, S., Kendrick, T., Kerry, S., Rink, E., Steptoe, A. (1999). Promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease in general practice: methodology and baseline data from the Change of Heart study. Health Education Journal 58: 3-16 [Abstract]  
  • Foy, R., Parry, J., McAvoy, B. (1998). Clinical trials in primary care. BMJ 317: 1168-1169 [Full text]  
  • Ebrahim, S., Smith, G. D. (1997). Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of multiple risk factor interventions for preventing coronary heart disease. BMJ 314: 1666-1666 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wonderling, D., Langham, S., Buxton, M., Normand, C., McDermott, C. (1996). What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British family heart studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ 312: 1274-1278 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Gillam, S., McCartney, P., Thorogood, M. (1996). Health promotion in primary care. BMJ 312: 324-325 [Full text]  
  • Clarke, A. (1995). Population screening for genetic susceptibility to disease. BMJ 311: 35-38 [Full text]  
  • (1995). Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: final results of the OXCHECK study. BMJ 310: 1099-1104 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Field, K, Thorogood, M, Silagy, C, Normand, C, O'Neill, C, Muir, J (1995). Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective?. BMJ 310: 1109-1112 [Abstract] [Full text]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ