Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls

doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393

Published 29 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2393

Research Methods & Reporting

Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls

Jonathan A C Sterne, Ian R White, John B Carlin, Michael Spratt, Patrick Royston, Michael G Kenward, Angela M Wood, and James R Carpenter

You have reached the most complete version of this article accessible without further authentication.
More complete versions are available.
Link to article

Article topics:

Medicine..Blood Pressure Determination
Physiology..Blood Pressure
Medicine..Research Personnel

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us Add to Digg

Digg

StumbleUpon Add to Technorati

Technorati What's this?

Relevant Articles

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies: Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart J Pocock, Peter C Gøtzsche, Jan P Vandenbroucke STROBE Initiative
BMJ 2007 335: 806-808. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study: Julia Hippisley-Cox, Carol Coupland, Yana Vinogradova, John Robson, Margaret May, and Peter Brindle
BMJ 2007 335: 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

Koch, H, van Bokhoven, M., Bindels, P., van der Weijden, T, Dinant, G., ter Riet, G (2009). The course of newly presented unexplained complaints in general practice patients: a prospective cohort study. Fam Pract 26: 455-465 [Abstract] [Full text]